Skip to content
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • SERVICES WE OFFER
    • REAL ESTATE LAW
      • REGISTRATION OF PREC
      • MORTGAGE REFINANCE IN MISSISSAUGA
      • PROPERTY TITLE TRANSFER
      • COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
      • TRUSTEE & SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT
      • CONDOMINIUM PURCHASE AGREEMENT
      • BUYING AND SELLING A BUSINESS
    • FAMILY LAW
      • DIVORCE LAW
      • PARENTING TIME AND DECISION MAKING
      • SEPARATION AGREEMENT
      • PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT
      • SPOUSAL SUPPORT ONTARIO
      • MARRIAGE FRAUD
      • INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
      • CHILD ABDUCTION CANADA
    • ESTATE AND WILLS
      • DRAFTING WILLS
    • IMMIGRATION LAW

    REAL ESTATE LAW

    MORTGAGE REFINANCE IN MISSISSAUGA

    PROPERTY TITLE TRANSFER

    COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

    TRUSTEE & SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT

    CONDOMINIUM PURCHASE AGREEMENT

    BUYING AND SELLING A BUSINESS

    FAMILY LAW

    DIVORCE LAW

    REGISTRATION OF PREC

    PARENTING TIME AND DECISION MAKING

    SEPARATION AGREEMENT

    PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT

    SPOUSAL SUPPORT ONTARIO

    MARRIAGE FRAUD

    INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE

    CHILD ABDUCTION CANADA

    ESTATE AND WILLS​

    DRAFTING WILLS

    IMMIGRATION LAW

  • BLOGS
  • GET APPOINTMENT
  • POLICY
  • CONTACT US

Landmark Cases That Shaped Women’s Rights in Canada

Women’s Rights in Canada

Canada’s legal history is marked by pivotal cases that have shaped and advanced women’s rights Canada, reinforcing gender equality and setting crucial legal precedents. Here are some of the most influential rulings:

The Persons Case (1929): Women as “Persons” in Law

In Edwards v. Attorney General of Canada, five women—known as the Famous Five—challenged the exclusion of women from the Senate. The Supreme Court of Canada initially ruled against them, but the case was appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain, which overturned the decision. The ruling declared that women were “persons” under the law, paving the way for women empowerment Canada with their participation in political life and affirming that the Constitution should evolve with societal progress.

Workplace Harassment: Janzen v. Platy Enterprises Ltd. (1989)

This landmark case established that sexual harassment is a form of sex-based discrimination under human rights law. Two female employees filed complaints against their employer for persistent harassment, but the Manitoba Court of Appeal ruled that the harassment did not constitute discrimination. The Supreme Court of Canada disagreed, finding that sexual harassment is inherently linked to gender-based discrimination. This decision significantly strengthened Canada women’s rights with protections for women in the workplace and shaped future sexual harassment policies.

Reproductive Rights: R v. Morgentaler (1988)

Dr. Henry Morgentaler challenged Canada’s restrictive abortion laws, which required women to obtain approval from a hospital committee before accessing an abortion. The Supreme Court ruled that these laws violated a woman’s right to security of the person under Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court found that the regulations were arbitrary and placed unnecessary health risks on women. This historic ruling effectively decriminalized abortion, leaving its regulation to medical practice and provincial guidelines upholding womens rights in Canada.

Consent and Sexual Assault: R v. Ewanchuk (1999)

This case reinforced the “no means no” principle in Canadian law, establishing that implied consent is not a valid defense in sexual assault cases. The accused argued that the complainant’s behavior suggested consent, despite her repeatedly saying “no.” The Supreme Court ruled that consent must be explicitly given and freely communicated, rejecting the notion that silence or passivity implies agreement. This case set a critical precedent for sexual assault laws, ensuring stronger protections for survivors and securing women’s rights in Canada.

The Role of the Charter in Women’s Rights

Since its adoption in 1982, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has been instrumental in advancing gender equality. Organizations like the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) have used the Charter to challenge discriminatory laws and advocate for women rights in courts. The Charter has served as a powerful tool in legal battles for reproductive freedom, workplace protections, and gender-based violence prevention.

Share

Related posts

habitual residence

Habitual Residence

June 30, 2025

What Is Habitual Residence — And Why It Matters in Family Law


Read more
Residential Real Estate
June 11, 2025

Understanding Personal Ownership of Residential Real Estate in Canada


Read more
Mental Illness
May 15, 2025

Mental Illness Doesn’t Mean Losing Your Child: What Courts Consider


Read more
© 2023 SR Law Firm Professional Corporation | All Rights Reserved. | Designed By Webtors