Skip to content
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • SERVICES WE OFFER
    • REAL ESTATE LAW
      • REGISTRATION OF PREC
      • MORTGAGE REFINANCE IN MISSISSAUGA
      • PROPERTY TITLE TRANSFER
      • COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
      • TRUSTEE & SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT
      • CONDOMINIUM PURCHASE AGREEMENT
      • BUYING AND SELLING A BUSINESS
    • FAMILY LAW
      • DIVORCE LAW
      • PARENTING TIME AND DECISION MAKING
      • SEPARATION AGREEMENT
      • PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT
      • SPOUSAL SUPPORT ONTARIO
      • MARRIAGE FRAUD
      • INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
      • CHILD ABDUCTION CANADA
    • ESTATE AND WILLS
      • DRAFTING WILLS
    • IMMIGRATION LAW

    REAL ESTATE LAW

    MORTGAGE REFINANCE IN MISSISSAUGA

    PROPERTY TITLE TRANSFER

    COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

    TRUSTEE & SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT

    CONDOMINIUM PURCHASE AGREEMENT

    BUYING AND SELLING A BUSINESS

    FAMILY LAW

    COLLABORATIVE FAMILY LAWYER

    DIVORCE LAW

    REGISTRATION OF PREC

    PARENTING TIME AND DECISION MAKING

    SEPARATION AGREEMENT

    PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT

    SPOUSAL SUPPORT ONTARIO

    MARRIAGE FRAUD

    INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE

    CHILD ABDUCTION CANADA

    ESTATE AND WILLS​

    DRAFTING WILLS

    IMMIGRATION LAW

  • BLOGS
  • GET APPOINTMENT
  • POLICY
  • CONTACT US

Why the Date of Separation Matters in Family Law

date of separation
Lessons from Kassabian v. Marcarian (2024)

When a marriage breaks down, it’s easy to assume that the emotional disconnect is enough to mark the end of the relationship. But in family law, intent matters. The legal date of separation isn’t just symbolic—it’s a pivotal moment that can affect property division, support entitlements, and limitation periods. A recent case from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Kassabian v. Marcarian, shows just how critical that date can be.

 

Key Legal Finding: It’s Not Over Until It’s Clearly Over

In this case, the court found that the legal date of separation was May 16, 2021—when the Wife explicitly communicated her intent to end the marriage with no hope of reconciliation.

This decision came despite the fact that the couple’s emotional and physical relationship had deteriorated years earlier, with no sexual intimacy after 2014 (except briefly in 2015). So why did the court pick 2021 and not 2014?

Because what matters legally is when at least one party clearly intends to separate and communicates that intention, as required by s. 4(1) of the Family Law Act. Emotional distance, while relevant, is not sufficient on its own.

 

The Facts Behind the Case

  • Married in 1998, the couple had two children together.
  • The Husband claimed they separated on December 10, 2014, while the Wife said it was May 16, 2021.
  • They attended marriage counseling in 2013, but didn’t follow through.
  • After 2014, their intimacy ceased, but they:
    • Continued living together,
    • Shared meals,
    • Attended family and social events together,
    • Traveled as a family, and
    • Filed joint tax returns as a married couple.

Despite this breakdown in the marital relationship, the court found no definitive step was taken to end the marriage until the Wife’s clear communication in 2021.

 

Court’s Analysis and Decision

The court reviewed all evidence and testimony and emphasized that separation requires both the intent to end the relationship and communication of that intent. Consulting a divorce coach, for example, wasn’t enough—the Wife didn’t follow through with legal steps or notify her Husband until much later.

On that basis, the court ruled that May 16, 2021 was the official divorce date of separation.

 

Why the Date of Separation Matters

This ruling wasn’t just about principles—it had real financial implications:

  • Dr. Marcarian (Husband): Argued for a 2014 separation, which would have barred the Wife’s claim for property equalization under the 6-year limitation period.
  • Dr. Kassabian (Wife): The 2021 date meant her claim was within the limitation period, allowing her to proceed with equalization of family property.

In short, the court’s finding preserved the Wife’s legal rights—and highlights why the separation date is far more important than many spouses realize.

Share

Related posts

Cohabitation Agreements
September 12, 2025

Cohabitation Pitfalls: What Happens to Property When You Split?


Read more
habitual residence

Habitual Residence

June 30, 2025

What Is Habitual Residence — And Why It Matters in Family Law


Read more
Residential Real Estate
June 11, 2025

Understanding Personal Ownership of Residential Real Estate in Canada


Read more
© 2023 SR Law Firm Professional Corporation | All Rights Reserved. | Designed By Webtors