In Ontario, the law draws a sharp line between married spouses and unmarried cohabiting partners when it comes to property rights.
The property division scheme in the Family Law Act applies only to married spouses. When a common-law relationship ends, each partner generally keeps the assets registered in their own name. Unlike married couples, there is no statutory right to share in the division of property no matter how long the couple has lived together.
Instead, common-law partners must turn to equitable remedies, including:
Unmarried partners who wish to protect their rights can do so by entering into a cohabitation agreement. Under section 53 of the Family Law Act, these agreements can set out:
Importantly, if the couple later marries, the cohabitation agreement automatically becomes a marriage contract.
Where no cohabitation agreement exists, courts may intervene using equitable principles. To succeed in an unjust enrichment claim, the claimant must establish:
Courts also assess whether the couple engaged in a “joint family venture”—a relationship defined by mutual effort, economic integration, and interdependence. Where this is found, remedies may include monetary awards or a share in specific property.
The Ontario decision in Risto v. Marcelais (2014 O.J. No. 1466) illustrates how these principles are applied. The court recognized that both parties made intertwined contributions—financial and non-financial—that allowed them to accumulate wealth during their cohabitation.